Fortinet Blog | News and Threat Research

  • Products
  • Solutions
  • Service & Support
  • Partners
  • Corporate
  • Resources
  • How to Buy

Fortinet Responds to NSS Labs Public Firewall Test

by RSS Patrick Bedwell  |  April 12, 2011  |  Category: Security Research

UPDATED Apr 17 with new information

Today NSS Labs, an independent security testing organization, issued a report which states it found holes in five of six network firewalls. Fortinet was named as one of these firewalls, and we want to address some misperceptions around this report.

NSS Labs tested the FortiGate-3950B platform using equipment supplied by an NSS customer. We have been working with NSS Labs over the last two months to remediate the issues raised in the test. NSS Labs incorrectly states that Fortinet does not currently provide customers with protection against a TCP split handshake.

In fact, FortiGate platforms are not susceptible to split handshake attacks when AV and IPS engines are enabled. Approximately 85% of our customers implement our product using multiple security components within one appliance.  Not only does this test support our premise that relying on a single technology can be less effective, it also supports the need to aggregate multiple security functions in an easy to use, low TCO product to provide the best protection.

We have been protecting our customers from split handshake attacks since 2006, when Fortinet developed an IPS signature (TCP.Stealth.Activity) that blocks the malicious activity related to the split handshake. This signature continues to protect customers today. Fortinet is creating a new IPS signature (TCP.Split.Handshake) to explicitly block the split handshake stealth approach, and will be available to all customers next week. Customers can enable a single IPS signature if they are not currently running the IPS feature that is included in the FortiGate consolidated security platform. Fortinet is also creating a patch for our firewall module to address the TCP split handshake issue, and we expect it will be available by the end of next week.

We feel strongly that integrated protection from multiple layers of security technology is the best approach for blocking this issue, and customers that have IPS working with their firewall are better protected against a wider range of threats. The majority of our customers recognize the benefit of deploying integrated functions, and thus are using firewall and IPS, as well as other security features.

Overall, we believe that the true threat lies in the exploits that can be passed over the established connection, and not the ability to establish a split handshake itself. During internal testing our researchers found that that the split handshake cannot be established when using FortiGate unified threat management functionality, and the attack cannot proceed.

Summary:

* We have been protecting customers for years with an existing IPS signature that blocks threats which could be passed along connections established via split handshake

* A new IPS signature will be available next week to customers to prevent establishing a TCP split handshake

* A firmware update for our firewall module for both FortiOS 4.0 MR2 and MR3 is in progress; we anticipate it being released by the end of next week

by RSS Patrick Bedwell  |  April 12, 2011  |  Category: Security Research
Tags: Firewall firewall test FortiGate nss labs UTM
comments powered by Disqus

Category

  • All
  • RSS Subscribe
  • Security Research
  • RSS Subscribe
  • Industry Trends & News
  • RSS Subscribe

FortiGuard Labs on the Web

  • Twitter Twitter
  • Facebook Facebook
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • Youtube Youtube

Monthly Archives

  • June 2013 10
  • May 2013 15
  • April 2013 17
  • March 2013 12
  • February 2013 11
  • January 2013 12
  • December 2012 8
  • November 2012 7
  • October 2012 4
  • September 2012 7
  • August 2012 7
  • July 2012 9
  • June 2012 17
  • May 2012 14
  • April 2012 16
  • March 2012 15
  • February 2012 11
  • January 2012 6
  • December 2011 4
  • November 2011 6
  • October 2011 11
  • September 2011 2
  • August 2011 2
  • July 2011 4
  • June 2011 6
  • May 2011 6
  • April 2011 5
  • March 2011 7
  • February 2011 5
  • January 2011 7
  • December 2010 8
  • November 2010 11
  • October 2010 3
  • September 2010 8
  • August 2010 4
  • July 2010 9
  • June 2010 9
  • May 2010 9
  • April 2010 6
  • March 2010 8
  • February 2010 6
  • January 2010 9
  • December 2009 8
  • November 2009 6
  • October 2009 6
  • September 2009 8
  • August 2009 5
  • July 2009 8
  • June 2009 7
  • May 2009 4
  • April 2009 7
  • March 2009 9
  • February 2009 4
  • January 2009 1
  • Older

Popular topics

privacy mobile malware zitmo BYOD Security apple stuxnet Antivirus symbianos adobe sms exploit conference hashdays UTM mobile google Fortinet derek manky Malware reverse engineering trojan mobile phone botnet hacking challenge Windows Mobile Security Mac OS X facebook bredolab challenge Threat Landscape webinar phishing cybercrime Anti-Spam reversing Cryptography Research microsoft symbian Zeus mobile phones Firewall Patch Tuesday iphone virut network security SpyEye symbos/yxes android FortiGate Anonymous