<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duh&#8217;s not malicious, dude!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fortinet.com/duhs-not-malicious-dude/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fortinet.com/duhs-not-malicious-dude/</link>
	<description>Real Time Network Protection</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 23:31:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Analysis of “Duh” &#171; Threat Researcher</title>
		<link>http://blog.fortinet.com/duhs-not-malicious-dude/comment-page-1/#comment-4080</link>
		<dc:creator>Analysis of “Duh” &#171; Threat Researcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fortinet.com/?p=817#comment-4080</guid>
		<description>[...] 11/12/2009:  A good analysis was recently published @ Fortinet&#8217;s blog. As I mentioned this worm is similar to OSX Jahlav and DNSChanger, in which the group behind mostly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 11/12/2009:  A good analysis was recently published @ Fortinet&#8217;s blog. As I mentioned this worm is similar to OSX Jahlav and DNSChanger, in which the group behind mostly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

